BMC replies to Kangana Ranaut’s Rs two cr compensation plea, says it is ‘abuse of process’ and should be rejected


New Delhi: The under no circumstances-ending saga in between Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and Bollywood actress Kangana Ranaut appears to have taken one more flip as the civic physique has urged the Bombay Substantial Court to reject actress’s plea trying to find Rs two crore compensation.

The BMC has filed an affidavit in response to Kangana Ranaut’s petition tough demolition of her workplace and harm declare of Rs two crore. In its affidavit, BMC stated, “The writ petition and the reliefs sought for therein constitute an abuse of procedure. The Petition really should not be entertained and really should be dismissed with prices.”

On September 9, the BMC had demolished a component of Kangana Ranaut’s Pali Hill bungalow in Mumbai, claiming that she had manufactured significant structural alterations with no due permission. Immediately after which the actress moved the HC on the very same day, a bench led by Justice S J Kathawalla stayed the demolition.

On September 15, Ranaut amended her plea, trying to find a compensation of Rs two crore from the BMC.

In its reply, filed as a result of advocate Joel Carlos, the BMC alleged that Ranaut falsely stated that the alterations have been as per a permission previously granted by it.

On September five, for the duration of a schedule inspection, its officials observed unlawful repairs and alterations getting carried out at the bungalow, so a demolition discover was issued and the demolition was subsequently carried out, it mentioned.

Ranaut applied the home as workplace room and had manufactured significant alterations and additions in violation of the sanctioned Making Strategy, the BMC alleged.

Toilets have been constructed in parking parts and current toilet room was converted into cabins and a pantry, it mentioned.

Ranaut could not argue that the demolition really should not have been carried out for the duration of the coronavirus-induced lockdown, for if she was carrying out alterations for the duration of this time period, she was liable to encounter action, the civic physique mentioned.

The subsequent hearing is slated for September 22.

(With PTI inputs)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *